|
Fishing Lines: Untangling
the Mess
Part one on modern fishing
lines
Grant Ferris
Grey/Bruce Outdoors
Monofilament, superline, spiderwire,
copolymer, kevlar, flurorocarbon and dyneema! What is all this technical
jargon and what does it mean to an angler?
Millions of dollars in television
advertisements are ample proof that selling fishing line is big business.
High-profile television anglers try and convince you that their sponsor’s
lines are tougher, stronger, and limper, they will catch more fish than
any other line. You absolutely have to use their latest product or there
is no sense going fishing!
What’s the truth?
Although the process of nylon
extrusion was invented in 1938, the nylon monofilament market really took
off with the boom in sport fishing after WW2. Fishing line manufacturers,
chasing after hundreds of millions of dollars in annual sales soon learned
to woo customers by developing new products or by using marketing ploys
to draw customers from their competitors products.
As a result, the angling public
has been provided with tremendous technical advances in the product but
at the same time assaulted with a volume of misinformation similar to the
propaganda released during the cold war.
It’s funny really, when you
think about it. How can there be a 10-pound test line, which is 30% stronger
than all the competitor’s products? It wouldn’t be 10 pound test anymore;
it would be 13-pound test!
This is marketing hype at its
worst and lots of companies practice it. Since some couldn’t outdo the
competition in quality, they resorted to false-labelling the product. Knowing
that few anglers carry micrometers, 14-pound test line is labelled as 10-pound
test and viola! We have a 40% improvement in line strength. It must be
magic.
Not all companies are guilty
of this baloney advertising and to be fair, some that are still make darn
good line. It’s just a very competitive business and millions of dollars
can be made through slick advertising. The advertising and sales departments
might not even know the engineering and development people.
After all, they must figure,
unless an angler hoped to qualify for a world record fish in a particular
line class, whom does it hurt? Except for destroying advertising credibility
in general, probably no one smart enough to read small print.
Before the latest round of
technical advances hit the market you could use simple rules to buy fishing
line. An angler would decide on a line by selecting monofilament that had
good knot strength, was limp enough, and had sufficient abrasion resistance
along with minimal line stretch. If it was hard to see in water, and had
a small diameter for it’s breaking strength, that was even better. Four
or five popular monofilament lines had varying degrees of these qualities
and usually the price was right. It was and is possible to buy a very good
monofilament fishing line in bulk spools from local tackle stores for a
reasonable price.
Competition and the space race
however, resulted in technical advances. Nylon monofilament was not the
final answer after all. Again we have a bewildering array of choices, lines
with yet smaller diameters, even less visible lines and some with almost
no stretch. Naturally these new products cost more money but they are absolutely
essential. Or are they? Part two of this article will include information
on the newer line developments including fluorocarbon and the minimal stretch
so called “superlines”, some field test results and the availability of
these products.
Untangling the Mess (part
two)
Nylon monofilament leaders
took over from gut leaders for fly fishers after WW2 and even in 1954 you
could buy a good grade of monofilament line called Damyl Platyl from West
Germany. For the next forty years or so, anglers had little choice other
than monofilament, although there was a bewildering variety of this mono
on the market.
Meanwhile, other line types
were being invented and used for special purposes. An example is the invention
of fluorocarbon lines by Kureha Chemicals in Japan more than twenty-five
years ago. Japanese domestic anglers wanted a low visibility line to catch
a spooky little fish called "Ayr." in the island streams and fluorocarbon
was the result of the search for a suitable product. This new lower visibility
line was overlooked by anglers elsewhere with the exception of some tuna
fishermen who used the line in heavy pound tests and found increased catches
justified the extra cost. At the same time, German and U.S. line development
proceeded in another direction with the emphasis on reducing stretch and
diameter. The first real departure from monofilaments to hit the North
American market was braided lines, made with materials developed from space
age research and woven into a smaller diameter per breaking strength than
mono could ever hope to achieve. These materials included lines braided
with Kevlar, “Spectra” ™ and “Dyneema” ™ fibres and for a while were the
best thing in special purpose lines available.
North American bass professionals
compete hard in big money tournaments and are always looking for an edge.
The braids quickly became popular when adopted by top tournament winners.
Suddenly there was a line available as light as 8-10 pound mono, with a
breaking strength of 20-25 pounds yet with almost no stretch and increased
sensitivity. In comparison the nylon monofilaments were like fishing with
thick twine attached to elastic bands. Soon however, amateur anglers discovered
that new materials require new methods and the skills to fish no-stretch
lines had to be learned. Thousands, even hundreds of thousands of rods
were broken and fish lost because the forgiving 25 per cent stretch of
mono wasn't there. Braided lines do not work as well nor cast as far on
spinning reels as they do on casting reels and the increased cost of the
product also turned off a lot of prospective users.
Next to come from the chemical
company labs was fused or bonded lines, using the new-super strength filaments
still but instead of being woven and ribbon-like, an inside core was bonded
to an outside sheath of filaments not unlike the construction of a marine
nylon rope. Fireline, Fusion and Raptor are lines made this way in a round
cross-section suitable at last for spinning reels. Although not completely
without stretch like the original braids, the compromise is a better overall
line.
Meanwhile rod and reel manufacturers
were quick to tell the great angling public that they had to buy specially
designed rods and reels to cope with the new lines…a promoter’s dream.
Get out that check-book again.
Using the New Lines
Today on the market we have
three new types of fishing lines, more expensive than monofilament but
vastly superior in most ways and thanks to competition, coming down quickly
in price.
I tried using the early woven
lines for winter jigging when they were first released but found the price
high and the product unsatisfactory due to the weave plugging up with ice.
The smaller diameters were easy to tangle and knot, almost impossible to
unknot and not as easy to handle as mono.
Next I tried Fireline and
Fusion, both on spinning and level wind reels. The low stretch of both
these lines made it much easier for me to feel light bites and set hooks
even in 100 feet of water and with 6-8 feet of monofilament leader there
appeared to be no loss of bites from fish being spooked by the lines. I
don't like the feel of either on a spinning outfit but they seem not bad
with a bait-casting rig.
Now that the price of fluorocarbon
line is more reasonable, a combination which should work even better for
jigging is a mainline of Fusion or Raptor and a fluorocarbon leader.
I also experimented with different
brands of fluorocarbon leaders, down-rigging for salmon, float-fishing
for rainbow trout and fly-fishing.
The first fluorocarbon leader
materials averaged about $15 to $20 per 25 metres and were distributed
under the Dragonfly, Dai-Riki and Orvis brand names but all may have been
made by the same company.
These leaders did not appear
to be less visible in a glass of water compared to mono of the same size
but in practice, fishing gin-clear water, the fluorocarbon leaders seemed
to catch more fish. They also had good knot strength and resisted abrasion
well.
Next I bought four different
tests of a fluorocarbon line made by Triple-Fish, designed to be used as
mainline and reasonably priced. In use it proved too sensitive to abrasion
and with insufficient knot strength, prone to breakage. After breaking
off about two dozen fish (some dandy rainbows too) with light pressure,
I filed this product away and crossed the product off my list. About a
year later I was told that early production problems created a bad first
batch which could be replaced if I sent in my spools to a distributor.
I did this and found the product much improved, although it will take a
little while before I have full confidence in the line.
In January of 2000 Bass Pro
Shops began carrying the new Berkely "Vanish" fluorocarbon line and at
$9.99 U.S. for 250 yards, if the product proves out, it could become very
popular. U.S. giant Cabela's outfitters have Sea-Guar fluorocarbon line
available in 150 yard spools for $14.99 US now, more expensive than monofilament
but many times less expensive than fluorocarbon leaders were just a few
years ago.
Since SeaGuar is made in Japan
by fluorocarbon line inventors Kureha Chemicals, I figured it was worth
a try so I ordered several spools of Sea-Guar in 4 & 6 pound test and
I had excellent results with it.
After two years using the same
spools of Seaguar as leader material with no problems as long as splicing
is done with surgeon's knots I can heartily recommend it. Sub-freezing
temperatures didn't adversely affect the line, if anything the cold water
made it perform even better.
|